Saturday, March 31, 2012

Blog 2: Stop Worrying about Raising a Mama's Boy


I have chosen the article “Stop Worrying about Raising a Mama’s Boy” by, KJ Dell’Antonia.  This article is from The New York Times, March 29th 2012.  As I read this article, I was made aware that boys can be stereotyped if they are overly attached to their mother, even at a young age.  This article relates to our class, especially the section we studied on “Learning Gender.” 

“What’s a “mama’s boy”?  A wimp of course, a child tied too tightly to his mother’s apron’s strings, overly sensitive, incapable of detaching, ready to “run to mama” at the slightest hint of diversity” (Dell’Antonia, 2012).  This quote is powerful and yet so true in today’s society.  Men and boys are supposed to be “strong” and “tough”, not someone who shows a strong emotional attachment to their mother.  We can see the “mama’s boy” stereotype on television as Robert, the awkward brother on “Everybody Loves Raymond.”  This article shows us how mothers are urged by others; and by society to push their sons away at a certain point in their lives, such as starting school or becoming a teenager.  One mother says “It was like some kind of shameful secret when we started to reveal how close we were to our [adult] sons” (Dell’Antonia, 2012).  This mother also mentions how she also has a daughter and how she would never feel embarrassed to tell others how close they are.  This article also explains how most mothers are going against their instincts to be affectionate and loving toward their sons, instead they will tell them to “man up” or “shake it off” because that is what society believes a man should do.

There are many ways in which one can try and understand why boys and men are raised to not be “wimpy” and cling to their mothers.  One article that we read in class by Judith Lorber “The Social Construction of Gender” speaks of gendered patterns of interaction.  Lorber says that “these patterns acquire additional layers of gendered sexuality, parenting, and work behaviors in childhood, adolescence, and adulthood” (Lorber, 1994).  Basically, depending on if you’re a boy or a girl, there are socially imposed standards and because of this, each gender will be treated differently.  Boys will be made tougher by not allowing them to cling to their mothers and become “mama’s boys.”  When boys are raised to not be “mama’s boys” and to be masculine instead, this continues on into adulthood.  In David   Wexler’s article “Shame-O-Phobia”, we are introduced to an adult man who becomes shamed to do something feminine such as carry his wife’s purse.  Wexler states in his article that “Men who’ve experienced toxic doses of shame early in life will do anything to avoid re-experiencing it as they grow older” (Wexler, 2010).  In other words, it is shameful to be a “mama’s boy” and be called “wimpy.”  It is portrayed that if a boy is a “mama’s boy”, this type of humiliation could follow him throughout his life and cause him to be ashamed to do anything feminine.

Some new information in the article “Stop Worrying about Raising a Mama’s Boy” that we did not see too much of in class was the fierce determination of mothers who want to have a close relationship to their sons without having them labeled.  In the article, you can hear a mothers pride when her ten year old son still wants to hold her hand in public.  She does not care what others think, nor will it stop her from being affectionate to him.  The gender of a child should not alter the affection that you give them.  More mothers today are showing their sons the same affections they are showing their daughters and resisting societal pressures more than ever.

References
Dell’Antonia, K.  “Stop Worrying about Raising a Mama’s Boy.”  The New York Times. March 29, 2012.  http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/29/stop-worrying-about-raising-a-mamas-boy/?scp=10&sq=feminism&st=cse#.

Wexler, D.  “Shame-O-Phobia.”  “Women’s Voices, Feminist Visions.” (141-144). 2012.

Lorber, J.  “The Social Construction of Gender.”  “Women’s Voices, Feminist Visions.” (126-128). 2012.

Blog 2: The Marriage Vow



By Melissa Schwab


                The article that I found and chose to write about today was an article posted on July 13th 2011 called “Romney says he won’t sign controversial marriage pledge” by CNN wire staff. The article is discussing the fact that he will not sign the marriage pledge that is trying to be put in place by the Iowa social conservative group, The Family Leader. Mitt Romney defiantly supports traditional marriages but the vow/pledge contains some controversial provisions that are not appropriate for a presidential campaign.
                After reading this article I did not know much about the Marriage pledge that the article was referencing so I looked it up online and read the vow itself. Although I am a firm believer on the fact that a marriage is sacred and there should be no infidelity in a marriage I did not agree with some of the facts that they had put into the vow before the actual pledge itself. Some of the things that the pledge states can be depicted as racist to many, for instance it says “Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USAs first African-American President.”
                That is just one example of a racist remark that is made in this pledge that the family leader proposed. The article also states that Michelle Bachmann and Rick Santorum on the other hand did sign the Marriage Vow. Because they did sign this and there is a preamble that I stated before suggesting black children born into slavery had better family structures than black children now, they had to clarify their support for the pledge. The excerpt has since been removed.
                To somewhat support this pledge that was in the Marriage vow, I will bring up the article that we just had to read this week regarding poor families “Too poor to parent” by Burroughs. This article along with many others has to do with race and how African American families are treated differently and looked at differently by the government and other people in society. For some reason the Family Leader felt the need to place this preamble in the Marriage Vow even though it was not appropriate. They showed their lack of respect for African American people and I agree with the fact that Mitt Romney did not sign this preamble.
                Another article that we have had to read for this course is “Marriage and Love” by Goldman. This preamble does have regard to a couple’s marriage and the socially acceptable things that they should go by, including be faithful to your partner. The article explains what marriage is and what love is and the depiction of marriage is cookie cutter and to the point just like the preamble is that was written by the Family Leader.
                To conclude, this preamble has some key points that are important to a healthy marriage but the fact that they put in the parts regarding African Americans I could not be a supporter of the Preamble and believe that Mitt Romney made a  smart choice in his presidential campaign to not sign this preamble like the others did.


News article:
Marriage Vow:

Blog 2: Sex, Lies and the Media


“We are all human, and it’s ok to look like a human. Nobody will ever measure up to the ideal beauty, that is literally and physically impossible,” stated commercial director and film maker Jesse Rotten. The article I read for my Blog 2 is “Sex, lies and the Media: New wave of activists challenge notions of beauty.” This article was written by Emanuella Grinberg and was found on CNN.com. The article on Siebel-Newsom’s documentary, Miss Representation discusses the ways in which media demeans, objectification and sexualized images of women. In this documentary many other aspects of this topic are explored.
            The movie, Miss Representation attacks the misportrayals of beauty in the media and its affect on the advancement of women. Grinberg (2012) explained in the article that media is a term used to describe all forms of mass communication, from the internet, TV, film, magazines, radio and advertising. Miss Representation has been aired on the Oprah Winfrey Network and over 700 times around the world. More than 2,000 schools have purchased curricula based on the film for classroom discussion (Grinberg 2012). Women make up 51% of the United States yet only 17% of seats in the House of Representatives (Grinberg 2012).   Jennifer Siebel-Newsom believes that women are aspiring to achieve greatness in leadership, but that they are unable to be taken seriously due to the media portrayal of women. Women are objectified more than ever, experts say, thanks to the constant barrage of images from all forms of media, many of them connecting products to a pair of breasts and a coy smile (Grinberg 2012). Objectification is seeing the body as an object and separate from its context (Shaw & Lee, 2012).  Bordo argues that mainstream Western media imagery tends to homogenize female beauty, removing racial, ethnic, and sexual differences that “disturb” Anglo-Saxon, heterosexual expectations and identifications. These beauty ideals become models against which women measure, judge, and discipline their bodies. (Rubin, Fitts, & Becker, 2003).
Today we live in a society in which someone is looked upon as beautiful if they are youthful, slender, tan, and have long flowing hair. Sizeism remains the only truly socially acceptable form of discrimination on the planet (Martin, 2008). The research in the last 10 years shows just how damaging this idea of self-objectification is, the idea that your value of self-worth is dependent on the amount of sexual attractiveness you have to the outside world (Grinberg 2012). The article also talks about the fake commercial made by Jesse Rosten called Fotoshop by Adobé. This video makes fun of beauty advertisement’s models and their unrealistic promise for physical change. The video states; the celebrities and models appearance creates an unrealistic expectation to the general public because of the extreme photo enhancement that takes place. In reality, it becomes physically impossible to replicate this image.  As a result,   Americans have created an unrealistic and unachievable standard of beauty. Not until all girls and women  are freed from stereotypical expectations about our natures and abilities will we also be freed from the bonds of the beauty culture (Weitz 2004).  
This article relates to class in reference to Chapter 5-Inscrbing Gender on the Body, in our textbook Women’s Voices, Feminist Vision. This chapter discusses beauty norms and expectations, what women will do to be perceived at beautiful, and the struggles women endure to be beautiful. The new information that I learned from this article is that many women are having trouble succeeding in business’ and government due to what people perceive in the media. I knew that women were affected by the media when it came to relationships and self-esteem, but not being taken serious enough to run a state. The information that I read in this article supported the readings and videos from class. That women today are being objectified, and having false expectations of beauty forced on them due to the media. Below I have provided a link the website to the article I have read, a link to the trailer for the video Miss Representation, and a link to the video Fotoshop by Adobé.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gkIiV6konY  (Miss Representation Trailer)

Grinber, E. (2012, March 12). Sex, lies, and media: New wave of activists challenge notions of
Martin, C.E. (2008). Love Your Fat Self. Women’s Voices, Feminist Visions (265-268). New
            York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Rubin,L.R., Fitts, M.K., & Becker, A.E. (2003). Body Ethics and Aesthetics Among African
American and Latina Women. Women’s Voices, Feminist Vision (243-252). New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Shaw, S.M.,& Lee, J. (2012). Women’s Voices, Feminist Visions (5th ed.). New York, NY: The
            McGraw-Hill Companies.
Weitz,R. (2004). What We Do for Love. Women’s Voices, Feminist Visions (253-262). New
            York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Friday, March 30, 2012

Blog 2 Article Discussion: "Women, Money and Power"

            The article I have chosen for this blog discussion is, “Women, Money and Power” by, Liza Mundy, from Time Magazine, March 26, 2012.  I first learned of this article listening to an interview of the author on Weekend Edition, on National Public Radio, March 18, 2012.  Liza Bundy also has a forthcoming book titled:  The Richer Sex , to be published by Simon and Schuster.  I believe this article supports what we have studied in class this semester.
            This article relates to our class studies in the areas: of feminist gains for working women, changing gender roles of men and women in regards to work, and the effects of this on their relationships.  It starts out by mentioning the significant change in the roles of a Michigan family in just one generation.  In the 1970’s the father of this family was the major bread winner and the mother stayed home with their six children.  Today, in five of the six families of the siblings, the primary income is earned by the female.  “Before 1970 the overwhelming majority of married women stopped working after they had children, today the overwhelming majority of married women do not” (Hess-Biber & Carter, 1999). 
            This reflects the influence of feminism to bring about these societal changes.  The article states that with the advent of the birth control pill women were able to pursue their educational and career goals without the worry of an unplanned pregnancy, women today are almost 60% of college students, and some predictions project that in 25 years women will dominate law and medical professions (Mundy, 2012).  This is a far cry from 1970 when a woman lawyer had to look for jobs in the “Help Wanted Male” section of the newspaper (Baumgardner & Richards, 2000).  Even though more women are becoming the primary wage earners in their homes there is still an overall wage disparity between men and women.  “Women working full time earn a median wage that is 81% of what men make” (Mundy, 2012).  So for now, equal pay for equal work has not been totally realized.
            This article brought up the change in gender roles that are occurring in families with the women being the primary wage earner.  In our society men are “trained, tailored, and told” they are to be the provider of their family and this is an essential part of their identity (Mundy 2012).  But it also points out that men are seeing a woman’s earning potential as a desirable trait in a partner, and housekeeping skills as being less valuable (Mundy 2012).  “One way of choosing people for the different tasks of society is on the basis of their talents, motivations and competence –their demonstrated achievements” (Lorber, 1994).  Economic trends trump culture, and the practical will prevail with men accepting their new roles, and personal aptitude and what works best for a family will be how decisions are based and not outdated gender roles (Mundy 2012).
            In fact, one very interesting topic that is covered in this article that we have not read as much about in our class is the gender changes for women who are becoming the primary wage earners.  “Up until now, feminists have argued that breadwinning – for men – should carry no special privilege, that male earners were wrong to think that their pay check bought them out of sorting socks.  Now women are having to ask what privileges, if any, their own breadwinning buys” (Mundy, 2012).  Some women interviewed for this article expressed conflicted feelings about their stay-at-home husbands spending “their” money and having a hard time seeing the earnings as not entirely their own (Mundy 2012).  There was also some resentment to deal with when the children were home bonding with dad, instead of mom who is at work (Mundy 2012).  We as human beings have tendencies toward resisting change and being self-centered in our approach to life.  So these are issues that will evolve and be resolved over time as men and women become more equal in the work place and the family.

References
            Mundy, L. “Women, Money and Power.” Time Magazine. (28-34). March 26, 2012.

            Hesse-Biber, S. & Carter, G.L. “A Brief History of Working Women.”  In, Women’s Voices, Feminist Visions.  (425). 2012.

            Baumgardner, J.  & Richards, A. “A Day Without Feminism.” In, Women’s Voices, Feminist Visions.  (30). 2012.

            Lorber, Judith. “The Social Construction of Gender.” In, Women’s Voices, Feminist Visions. (127). 2012.