Saturday, March 31, 2012

Blog 2: Stop Worrying about Raising a Mama's Boy


I have chosen the article “Stop Worrying about Raising a Mama’s Boy” by, KJ Dell’Antonia.  This article is from The New York Times, March 29th 2012.  As I read this article, I was made aware that boys can be stereotyped if they are overly attached to their mother, even at a young age.  This article relates to our class, especially the section we studied on “Learning Gender.” 

“What’s a “mama’s boy”?  A wimp of course, a child tied too tightly to his mother’s apron’s strings, overly sensitive, incapable of detaching, ready to “run to mama” at the slightest hint of diversity” (Dell’Antonia, 2012).  This quote is powerful and yet so true in today’s society.  Men and boys are supposed to be “strong” and “tough”, not someone who shows a strong emotional attachment to their mother.  We can see the “mama’s boy” stereotype on television as Robert, the awkward brother on “Everybody Loves Raymond.”  This article shows us how mothers are urged by others; and by society to push their sons away at a certain point in their lives, such as starting school or becoming a teenager.  One mother says “It was like some kind of shameful secret when we started to reveal how close we were to our [adult] sons” (Dell’Antonia, 2012).  This mother also mentions how she also has a daughter and how she would never feel embarrassed to tell others how close they are.  This article also explains how most mothers are going against their instincts to be affectionate and loving toward their sons, instead they will tell them to “man up” or “shake it off” because that is what society believes a man should do.

There are many ways in which one can try and understand why boys and men are raised to not be “wimpy” and cling to their mothers.  One article that we read in class by Judith Lorber “The Social Construction of Gender” speaks of gendered patterns of interaction.  Lorber says that “these patterns acquire additional layers of gendered sexuality, parenting, and work behaviors in childhood, adolescence, and adulthood” (Lorber, 1994).  Basically, depending on if you’re a boy or a girl, there are socially imposed standards and because of this, each gender will be treated differently.  Boys will be made tougher by not allowing them to cling to their mothers and become “mama’s boys.”  When boys are raised to not be “mama’s boys” and to be masculine instead, this continues on into adulthood.  In David   Wexler’s article “Shame-O-Phobia”, we are introduced to an adult man who becomes shamed to do something feminine such as carry his wife’s purse.  Wexler states in his article that “Men who’ve experienced toxic doses of shame early in life will do anything to avoid re-experiencing it as they grow older” (Wexler, 2010).  In other words, it is shameful to be a “mama’s boy” and be called “wimpy.”  It is portrayed that if a boy is a “mama’s boy”, this type of humiliation could follow him throughout his life and cause him to be ashamed to do anything feminine.

Some new information in the article “Stop Worrying about Raising a Mama’s Boy” that we did not see too much of in class was the fierce determination of mothers who want to have a close relationship to their sons without having them labeled.  In the article, you can hear a mothers pride when her ten year old son still wants to hold her hand in public.  She does not care what others think, nor will it stop her from being affectionate to him.  The gender of a child should not alter the affection that you give them.  More mothers today are showing their sons the same affections they are showing their daughters and resisting societal pressures more than ever.

References
Dell’Antonia, K.  “Stop Worrying about Raising a Mama’s Boy.”  The New York Times. March 29, 2012.  http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/29/stop-worrying-about-raising-a-mamas-boy/?scp=10&sq=feminism&st=cse#.

Wexler, D.  “Shame-O-Phobia.”  “Women’s Voices, Feminist Visions.” (141-144). 2012.

Lorber, J.  “The Social Construction of Gender.”  “Women’s Voices, Feminist Visions.” (126-128). 2012.

3 comments:

  1. Leah,
    The information in your last paragraph is heart warming. I can't imagine turning the affection of any child away and have fond memories of my boys being clingy up to a certain age, then letting go and coming back around as adults. I have been so happy to see society accepting and changing their thoughts about "masculinity" norms, even though we did learn from Lorber and Wexler that boys and men have had to pay a strong price for stepping out of the boundries. It has been a slow change in acceptance and women have had a strong influence on this change. Not only by our strength and power from all the women's movements, but by our approval of men being able to be who they are and show their true selves.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Leah, I enjoyed reading your post! I have two adult daughters and two adult sons and I am very thankful to be close to all four. We have different relationships, but all close. When I was raising my boys I read/heard to not stop showing affection to teenage boys – even if your methods of showing it are more covert – like rubbing their hair or patting their knees. We always kissed on the cheek and hugged all of our children goodnight regardless of age. I am glad we did it. My boys always hug kiss both my husband and I still and I don’t think their masculinity has suffered!

    I think people that use the term “mama’s boy” or “wimpy” may secretly wish they had an affectionate relationship with their parents and siblings. It’s sad to withhold affection out of fear of something that is really almost akin to bullying. I think Wexler’s “Shame-O-Phobia” reading was sad, that the adult man was embarrassed to hold his own wife’s purse? When I read that I was shocked. I think it is much more productive to teach children not to care what others think more than reinforcing avoiding negative stereo-types at all cost.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Leah, your post was great. I believe that labeling children as "Mama's boys" is wrong. I believe little boys should be able to show affection and care for their mothers without being ridiculed. I have always considered myself a Daddy's girl. And I do not believe this is a bad thing. My father and I were very close throughout the years. I have never been ridiculed because of this. I was 24 when my father passed away and I still told him I loved him everyday and kissed him goodbye anytime I was around him and about to leave.
    As a parent you should not have to worry about the way you treat your children. It is a shame that mothers and sons alike have to worry about being seen together, or showing affection towards one another. I do believe that there is such a thing as coddling a child to much and making them a wimp. But you need to figure out where that line is with your own child, because I think it is different for each child.
    Again Leah, I enjoyed reading the article that you wrote.

    ReplyDelete